WHO-5: WHO Well-Being Index

5-item measure of subjective psychological well-being. ≈ 1 min to complete. Free with attribution.

wellbeing 5 items ≈ 1 min Updated 2026-05-06

Score WHO-5 below → Download printable PDF View source paper (DOI)
What is WHO-5? WHO-5 (WHO Well-Being Index) is a validated instrument used to assess 5-item measure of subjective psychological well-being.. It is used in 5-item measure of subjective psychological well-being.. It comprises 5 items. Administration takes about 1 min.

What is WHO-5?

WHO-5 (WHO Well-Being Index) is a validated clinical instrument used to assess 5-item measure of subjective psychological well-being.. It is most often used for 5-item measure of subjective psychological well-being.. The instrument contains 5 items. Typical administration time is ≈ 1 min.

Source / attribution: Free to use with citation

Clinical context: when WHO-5 is used

5-item measure of subjective psychological well-being. WHO-5 is part of standard practice in this setting because it provides a structured, replicable assessment that can be tracked over time and compared across patients or visits.

Like all screening or assessment instruments, WHO-5 is a structured aid — not a diagnostic test in isolation. Results should be interpreted alongside history, examination, and clinical context. Where a score crosses an actionable threshold, the next step is typically a more detailed clinical evaluation rather than a definitive diagnosis.

Score WHO-5

Answer all 5 items below to see your WHO-5 score and interpretation.

Each item is scored on a 6-point scale (0–5). Your score updates live as you answer.

All scoring runs in your browser. No data is sent anywhere — close the tab and the answers are gone.

How WHO-5 is scored

Sum all 5 items scored 0-5, then multiply by 4 to get 0-100 percentage score. Higher = better well-being.

Scoring notes: Sum all 5 items scored 0-5, then multiply by 4 to get 0-100 percentage score. Higher = better well-being.

WHO-5 score interpretation

The cutoffs below are drawn from the published validation literature. Always interpret in clinical context.

Score rangeBandInterpretation
0–28Poor well-beingConsider intervention
29–50Moderate well-beingMonitor
51–100Good well-beingMaintain

How to score WHO-5: a step-by-step worked example

This is an illustrative walkthrough, not a real patient. Follow the same four steps with your own answers — or use the live calculator at the top of this page.

Step 1 — Score each item

Read each question and choose the response that best fits. Each response has a number next to it — that number is the item's score. The example below uses illustrative answers.

#ItemExample responseScore
1I have felt cheerful and in good spiritsAll of the time5
2I have felt calm and relaxedAll of the time5
3I have felt active and vigorousAll of the time5
4I woke up feeling fresh and restedAll of the time5
5My daily life has been filled with things that interest meAll of the time5

Step 2 — Add up the scores

Add up all the item scores you noted in Step 1.

5 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 5 = 25

Step 3 — Look up the band

Find the row in the interpretation table whose range contains your total:

Total = 25 falls between 0 and 28Poor well-being

Step 4 — What does this mean clinically?

Poor well-being. Consider intervention

A score is one input alongside history and examination. WHO-5 supports clinical judgment — it does not replace it.

Score WHO-5 with your own answers above →

WHO-5 psychometric properties

Psychometric figures are drawn from the validation literature and may vary across clinical populations and translations.

Limitations & common pitfalls

How WHO-5 compares to other wellbeing scales

If WHO-5 doesn't fit your context, related instruments in wellbeing include:

ScaleMeasuresItemsTime
FS8-item measure of self-perceived success in relationships, self-esteem, purpose, and optimism.8≈ 2 min
SPANE12-item measure of positive and negative emotional experiences.12≈ 2 min
MLQ10-item measure assessing presence of meaning and search for meaning in life.10≈ 3 min
GQ-66-item measure of individual differences in the disposition to experience gratitude.6≈ 2 min
SHS4-item global measure of subjective happiness using absolute ratings and social comparisons.4≈ 1 min
AHS12-item measure of dispositional hope with agency and pathways subscales.12≈ 3 min
PWB-1818-item short form assessing six dimensions of psychological well-being: autonomy, environmental mastery, personal growth, positive relations, purpose in life, and self-acceptance.18≈ 5 min
PGIS9-item measure of active, intentional engagement in personal growth and self-change.9≈ 2 min

Frequently asked questions about WHO-5

What does WHO-5 measure?

WHO-5 (WHO Well-Being Index) is a validated instrument that assesses 5-item measure of subjective psychological well-being.. Its primary clinical use is 5-item measure of subjective psychological well-being..

How long does WHO-5 take to complete?

WHO-5 typically takes ≈ 1 min to administer. Time can vary slightly depending on whether it is self-administered or clinician-led.

How many items are on WHO-5?

WHO-5 contains 5 items. Items are summed to produce a total score.

What is a high WHO-5 score?

Scores of 51–100 fall in the "Good well-being" band. Maintain

What is a low WHO-5 score?

Scores of 0–28 fall in the "Poor well-being" band. Consider intervention

How reliable is WHO-5?

WHO-5 has reported Cronbach's α of 0.92 in validation samples and test–retest reliability of 0.82. Sensitive to change; used in clinical trials.

Is WHO-5 free to use?

WHO-5 is free to use with attribution. Free to use with citation

What is the source paper for WHO-5?

Bech, P., Olsen, L. R., Kjoller, M., & Rasmussen, N. K. (2003). Measuring well-being rather than the absence of distress symptoms. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1(29), 1-6.

Can WHO-5 replace clinical judgment?

No. WHO-5 is a structured assessment aid. A score is one input alongside history, examination, and clinical context. Treatment decisions should never rest on a screening score alone.

References & validation

WHO-5 is supported by the following peer-reviewed sources: